Blog: The blog shows the design process but there is little explanation to how the final design came about.
It relies heavily upon photos, which do not appear to be the focus of the project.
However, the layout was immpressive. Although more information could have been included.
There was a lack of methods shown on how the journey was recorded.
Overall the blog doesn't encourage dialogue as there is a limited amount.
Exhibition: The planning of the exhibition was good and everybody had a clear idea of what they were supposed to do and present. However from the exhibition it seemed that there was a slight lack of team workdue to the approach taken with the different titles.
The presentation of the work on the boards was clear and to the point which was good engaging the audience, although we believe that the actual route taken was not shown clearly enough aside from the model cube.
The Thing: At first the thing was engaging and gathered other groups aswell as ours making it overt. The main point of ther thing was unclear and without explanation pretty meaningless, but with explanation it became more clear and a much stronger piece of work which was both interesting and visually pleasing.
The thing did work as the audience definately engaged with the piece and were made to think and interpret it in their own way, so as with the ropes ending up all in different positions (routes)of the journey, peoples' interpretation were alike the ropes arriving at different endings.
1 comment:
Blog:
The blog shows the design process but there is little explanation to how the final design came about.
It relies heavily upon photos, which do not appear to be the focus of the project.
However, the layout was immpressive. Although more information could have been included.
There was a lack of methods shown on how the journey was recorded.
Overall the blog doesn't encourage dialogue as there is a limited amount.
Exhibition:
The planning of the exhibition was good and everybody had a clear idea of what they were supposed to do and present. However from the exhibition it seemed that there was a slight lack of team workdue to the approach taken with the different titles.
The presentation of the work on the boards was clear and to the point which was good engaging the audience, although we believe that the actual route taken was not shown clearly enough aside from the model cube.
The Thing:
At first the thing was engaging and gathered other groups aswell as ours making it overt. The main point of ther thing was unclear and without explanation pretty meaningless, but with explanation it became more clear and a much stronger piece of work which was both interesting and visually pleasing.
The thing did work as the audience definately engaged with the piece and were made to think and interpret it in their own way, so as with the ropes ending up all in different positions (routes)of the journey, peoples' interpretation were alike the ropes arriving at different endings.
In conclusion 'I like'.
x
Post a Comment